Governance; consensus and trust

We are facing one of the processes and mechanisms that, although not new or unknown, serves to make decisions about the proper functioning, development, and evolution of a blockchain, protocol, or decentralized tool. It involves establishing rules and procedures to ensure the smooth operation of the network, resolve conflicts, and make important decisions that positively impact the ecosystem. The failure of governance in the traditional and centralized system has been the lack of incentives for it to truly work.

Governance typically involves an entire community, including developers, miners, token holders, and other stakeholders with a personal interest in the network. All these participants can contribute to the governance process through different mechanisms, as voting is not the only option; they can also propose improvements and engage in debates.

No hay texto alternativo para esta imagen

In broad terms, we can say that there are different governance models:

On-chain governance:

Here, governance decisions are made through voting mechanisms integrated directly into the blockchain’s protocol. Token holders can vote on proposals or changes to the protocol, and the results are automatically implemented through smart contracts.

Off-chain governance:

This is a governance model that involves decision-making processes taking place outside the blockchain. Discussions, debates, and voting occur on platforms such as forums, social networks, or dedicated governance platforms.

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs):

DAOs are autonomous entities that operate through smart contracts on a blockchain, allowing stakeholders to participate in decision-making, allocate resources, and vote on proposals in a decentralized manner.

The governance process has been and continues to be crucial in maintaining the integrity, security, and sustainability of the entire ecosystem, as it aligns perfectly with game theory and incentives. It also keeps the community alive and engaged, striking the right balance between decentralization and efficiency, which remains a constant challenge in the crypto space. Making decisions about project funding, development, or marketing undoubtedly requires governance with a strong focus and determination for continuous improvement, satisfying the specific needs of both the project and the community at any given time.

No hay texto alternativo para esta imagen

The fundamental disruptive feature of blockchain is its ability to decentralize consensus and trust in any network without the need for approval from a central authority. Governance has the potential to strengthen coordination capabilities within the internet, providing a clear example of how many cities could function in the future, with citizens caring, protecting, and generating indirect processes capable of fostering inclusion, prosperity, trust, and consensus. It is not unreasonable to think that cities and societies, at this stage, face various challenges (economic, military, or environmental), which, without proper governance or fragmented governance, we will be unable to overcome due to a lack of coordinated strategic movements to address these challenges.

No hay texto alternativo para esta imagen

In the future, governance will continue to evolve as projects become more complex, needs become more ambitious, and user communities continue to grow.